Carbon dating dinosaur soft tissue
Robert Martin) said that the dates were obviously wrong because of contamination. He specifically said that carbon-14 dating is accurate to within 100 years or so.During the Q&A session with the audience that followed the debate, one person asked how reliable dating methods are. I chimed in with, “Well, unless it is dinosaur fossils being dated. Mark Hollis Armitage and Kevin Lee Anderson, “Soft sheets of fibrillar bone from a fossil of the supraorbital horn of the dinosaur Triceratops horridus,” , 115(6):603–608, 2013 Return to Text 2. Alexander Cherkinsky, “Radiocarbon Analysis Report,” The University of Georgia Center for Applied Isotope Studies, August 14, 2012. But you can predict how long it will take a large group of atoms to decay.
The element's half-life is the amount of time it takes for half the parent atoms in a sample to become daughters.
(Mark Armitage) was subsequently fired from his position at California State University Northridge.
Carbon dating dinosaur soft tissue comments